Luke 3:33

Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,

Luke 3:33

Luke 3:33 continues the line: “Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda.” This portion emphasizes the tribe of Judah and the royal lineage that culminates in David and Jesus. The genealogical structure deepens the sense that God’s promises operate through families and tribal identities, even as Luke moves toward universal implications of the gospel.

Aminadab, Aram, Esrom (Esau’s line is sometimes confused with Esrom in tradition; in Luke, Esrom is often identified with Hezron), and Pharez signal continuity with the Messianic expectation. The inclusion of Juda (Judah) underscores the central Messianic claim—Jesus as the descendant of the royal line from Judah—fulfilling prophecies about the Suffering Servant-King.

Leaning into God’s plan means recognizing that your line matters in God’s purposes. You may not see immediate fruit, but faithfulness can ripple across generations. Practical steps: keep a family prayer list for future generations; tell family stories about perseverance and faith; reflect on how your daily choices align with God’s larger redemptive narrative.

Cross-References: Genesis 38:29-30; Genesis 49:8-12; Luke 3:21-38

Cross-References

Genesis 38:29-30Genesis 49:8-12Luke 3:21-38

Explore This Verse with Biblical Personas

Discuss Luke 3:33 with Biblical figures who can provide unique perspectives grounded in Scripture.