Luke 3:31

Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,

Luke 3:31

Luke 3:31 continues: “Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David.” This segment explicitly links Jesus to David, a central messianic expectation in Jewish thought. Nathan is one of David’s sons, anchoring the royal line. The juxtaposition of a kingly ancestry with the humbler origins seen in other parts of the genealogy highlights the paradox of the Messiah: born in humility, yet destined for royal authority.

David’s inclusion foregrounds the fulfillment of the Davidic Covenant—God’s promise of a king who would reign with righteousness. Yet Luke signals that this king is not only humanly descended but also fully in tune with God’s redemptive purpose. The genealogy blends royal hope with the broader humanity of Jesus, foreshadowing the kingdom principles Jesus would teach, such as service, mercy, and justice.

This invites humility and responsibility: those with leadership influence can learn from David’s mixed legacy, seeking repentance and faithfulness. For ordinary believers, it’s a reminder that God uses unlikely vessels to advance his kingdom. Practical steps: practice servant leadership at work or in your community; mentor someone into leadership with integrity; cultivate a heart that values justice, mercy, and humility.

Cross-References: 2 Samuel 7:12-16; Jeremiah 23:5-6; Luke 1:32-33; Matthew 1:6-16

Cross-References

2 Samuel 7:12-16Jeremiah 23:5-6Luke 1:32-33Matthew 1:6-16

Explore This Verse with Biblical Personas

Discuss Luke 3:31 with Biblical figures who can provide unique perspectives grounded in Scripture.