John 18:39
But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?
John 18:39
Pilate references a long-standing Passover custom: releasing a prisoner chosen by the crowd. He offers Jesus’ release not to vindicate Jesus but to pivot toward public appeasement. The crowd’s prior insistence contrasts with the possibility of mercy, revealing a tense interplay between political theater and genuine justice. This moment shows how public opinion can be weaponized, and how a ritual act (the release) can be used to mask a deeper, unjust outcome. The “custom” is a window into Rome’s method of maintaining order through staged clemency rather than true mercy.
This verse foregrounds mercy, choice, and the fragility of justice under political pressure. It raises questions about how “freedom” is granted, and what kind of release would truly serve justice. Theologically, Jesus as the true Passover substitute stands in contrast to a ritual act that would have extended mercy on a human level but would not reconcile humanity to God. The paragraph invites readers to consider whether they prefer political convenience over the cross-centered salvation Jesus embodies.
We might face moments where mercy appears as a public relations move rather than a genuine act. In leadership or governance, consider whether decisions are made to win applause rather than to seek true justice. On a personal level, reflect on whether you extend mercy as a manipulative gesture or as a sincere, costly grace. Practical steps: examine motives behind acts of mercy, ask, “Is this truly restorative?” and be wary of “customs” that bypass heartfelt justice. Let the contrast between custom and genuine mercy guide ethical choices in family, church, and civic life.
Cross-References
- Romans 12:17-21
- Matthew 27:16-26 (Pilate’s dilemma)
- Luke 23:24
- Titus 3:5
- Hebrews 4:16